Same IG that let NORAD off the hook for 9/11.
With regards to the fight for 9/11 Justice, here is how Able Danger helps I believe…
Here is what Able Danger does…
1) It is another example that information pertaining to some of the alleged hijackers was in the Government realm prior to…… 9/11 happening.
2) It is an example of Government retaliation against whistleblowers.
3) It shows how absurd the 9/11 Commission was.
4) It brings Philip Zelikow into the spotlight.
5) It brings up 9/11 whistleblowers in general.
6) It brings the CIA’s connection to the ISI into the spotlight.See More
12 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
12 minutes ago · LikeUnlike
7) It shows the Inspector General for the DoD was a fraud.
Witnesses Suggest Cover-Up of 9/11 Findings
October 4, 2010
Source: FOXNews.com
A document obtained and witnesses interviewed by Fox News raise new questions over whether there was an effort by the Defense Department to cover up a pre-9/11 military intelligence program known as “Able Danger.”
At least five witnesses questioned by the Defense Department’s Inspector General told Fox News that their statements were distorted by investigators in the final IG’s report — or it left out key information, backing up assertions that lead hijacker Mohammed Atta was identified a year before 9/11. …
The witness told Fox News she was interviewed twice by a Defense Department investigator. She said she told the investigator that it was highly likely a department database included the picture of Atta, whom she knew under an alias, Mohammed el-Sayed.
“When it came to the picture, (the investigator) he was fairly hostile,” the witness told Fox News. She said it seemed the investigator just didn’t want to hear it. “Meaning that he’d ask the same question over and over again, and, you know, you get to the point you go, well, you know… it’s the same question, it’s the same answer.”
The IG report didn’t accurately reflect her statements to investigators, she said, adding that she doesn’t think the investigator simply misunderstood her.
Lt. Col Tony Shaffer, an operative involved with Able Danger, said he was interviewed three times by Defense investigators. He claims it was an effort to wear down the witnesses and intimidate them. Two other witnesses, one a military contractor and the other a retired military officer, said they had the same experience. The two witnesses spoke to Fox News on the condition of anonymity because they said they feared retaliation. A fifth witness told Fox that statements to investigators were ignored.
“My last interview was very, very hostile,” Shaffer told Fox News last month before he was ordered by the department not to discuss portions of his book, “Operation Dark Heart,” which included a chapter on the Able Danger data mining project.